Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs): The Epitome of Carbon Neutrality in Polymers

Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) stand out as the epitome of carbon neutrality among polymers. Derived from renewable sources through bacterial fermentation, PHAs actively sequester carbon during production, contributing to a net-zero or net-negative carbon impact. Their biodegradability completes a closed-loop cycle, contrasting sharply with traditional polymers and even some biopolymers. PHAs represent a genuine solution to plastic waste, showcasing a sustainable future where technology aligns with environmental responsibility.


Dr. Pravin G. Kadam

12/7/20233 min read

In the relentless pursuit of sustainable alternatives to traditional plastics, Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) emerge as a shining beacon of carbon neutrality. Unlike many other biopolymers and certainly in stark contrast to conventional petroleum-based polymers, PHAs present a unique and genuine solution to the environmental challenges posed by plastic waste. In this blog post, we will explore the reasons why PHAs are often considered perfectly carbon neutral compared to other biopolymers and standard polymers.

Bio-Based Origins: A Fundamental Distinction

PHAs owe their carbon neutrality to their bio-based origins. Unlike polymers derived from fossil fuels, which contribute to the net increase in atmospheric carbon dioxide, PHAs are synthesized by bacteria through the fermentation of renewable carbon sources. This fundamentally distinguishes them from polymers like polyethylene or polypropylene, which rely on hydrocarbons extracted from non-renewable sources.

Carbon Sequestration: Nature's Own Offset Mechanism

The process of PHA production involves carbon sequestration, acting as a natural offset mechanism. Bacteria, during fermentation, actively capture and convert carbon from organic feedstocks into the polymer structure. This means that the carbon utilized in PHAs is essentially removed from the atmospheric carbon cycle, contributing to a net-zero or even a net-negative carbon impact.

Biodegradability and Closed-Loop Sustainability

PHAs' journey doesn't end with their beneficial production process; it extends to their end-of-life fate. These biopolymers are fully biodegradable under various environmental conditions. When PHAs break down, the carbon stored in them is released back into the environment as part of the natural carbon cycle. This is in stark contrast to traditional polymers that persist in the environment for extended periods, contributing to long-term carbon emissions.

Comparisons with Other Biopolymers

While PHAs excel in their carbon-neutral attributes, other biopolymers also contribute to sustainability efforts but may fall short in certain aspects. For example, Polylactic Acid (PLA), derived from fermented plant sugars, is biodegradable but requires specific conditions for complete degradation. Additionally, the industrial-scale production of PLA relies on energy-intensive processes, impacting its overall carbon footprint.

Contrasting with Conventional Polymers

Conventional polymers derived from fossil fuels, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, have dominated the market for decades. However, their production involves the extraction and processing of non-renewable resources, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions and environmental degradation. In contrast, PHAs leverage renewable resources, actively sequester carbon during production, and facilitate a closed-loop cycle through biodegradability.


In the realm of polymers, where the environmental toll of plastic waste has reached alarming levels, Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) emerge as a beacon of hope and a genuine force for positive change. Their carbon-neutral attributes, stemming from bio-based origins, carbon sequestration, and closed-loop sustainability, set them apart not only from conventional polymers but also from some other biopolymers. As the world shifts towards more sustainable practices, PHAs exemplify a solution where technological innovation aligns harmoniously with the principles of environmental responsibility. It's not merely about finding alternatives; it's about embracing a truly carbon-neutral future, and PHAs are leading the charge.


  1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960852402002122

  2. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096085242030403X

  3. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958166914001037

  4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19960105)49:1%3C1::AID-BIT1%3E3.0.CO;2-P

  5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964830517300276

  6. https://ri.conicet.gov.ar/handle/11336/4563

  7. https://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/2014/802984.pdf

How is carbon neutrality checked?

Evaluating the carbon neutrality of polymers involves conducting a life cycle assessment (LCA) to analyze the environmental impacts associated with the entire life cycle of the polymer, from raw material extraction and production to use and disposal. The goal is to quantify the total greenhouse gas emissions, including carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e), associated with each stage of the polymer's life cycle.

Here are the key steps involved in assessing the carbon neutrality of polymers:

  1. Raw Material Extraction and Production:

    • Identify the source of raw materials used in polymer production.

    • Quantify the energy consumption and emissions associated with the extraction and processing of raw materials.

    • Assess the environmental impact of the production process, including energy use, emissions, and waste generation.

  2. Polymer Manufacturing:

    • Evaluate the energy consumption and emissions during the polymerization process.

    • Consider any additional processes involved in creating the polymer, such as chemical treatments or modifications.

  3. Transportation:

    • Analyze the emissions associated with transporting raw materials to the manufacturing facility and transporting the polymer to end-users.

  4. Product Use:

    • Assess the energy consumption and emissions during the use phase of the polymer product. For example, in the case of packaging materials, consider how the packaging affects the carbon footprint of the packaged product.

  5. End-of-Life:

    • Examine the emissions and environmental impact associated with the disposal or recycling of the polymer. Biodegradable polymers, for instance, may produce different emissions during decomposition compared to non-biodegradable ones.

  6. Carbon Sequestration or Offsetting:

    • If applicable, consider any mechanisms in place to sequester or offset carbon emissions. For example, in the case of biopolymers derived from plants, the carbon sequestration during plant growth may be considered as a carbon offset.

  7. Comparative Analysis:

    • Compare the overall carbon footprint of the polymer with alternative materials or processes, such as traditional petroleum-based polymers or other sustainable materials.

Life cycle assessments can be complex and may involve numerous variables and data points. Researchers use specialized software and models to perform LCAs, and the results are often presented as a carbon footprint per unit of material produced.